2012 predictions

First of all, I’d say the Cardinals have found their replacement for Albert Pujols!

Minor League Guy on third

I’m currently out of work, which would have allowed me to sit in front of the TV on Opening Day and live-tweet, as I did in some past years (even before Twitter was invented) — but instead, I’m going to be in Ireland, where there will probably not be any baseball on TV.

On to the predictions. Kansas City appears to be Sports Illustrated’s pick to be the surprising team of the year, but our cold equations still have them finishing last in the AL Central. They’re also obviously taking Pujols into account with their Angels prediction, but we’re not.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (95-67) 1. N.Y. Yankees (96-66)
2. Tampa Bay Rays (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (93-69)
3. Boston Red Sox (91-71) 3. Boston Red Sox (90-72)
4. Toronto Blue Jays (85-77) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (82-80)
5. Baltimore Orioles (63-99) 5. Baltimore Orioles (68-94)
AL Central
1. Detroit Tigers (93-69) 1. Detroit Tigers (90-72)
2. Kansas City Royals (82-80) 2. Chicago White Sox (82-80)
3. Cleveland Indians (80-82) 3. Cleveland Indians (76-86)
4. Minnesota Twins (72-90) 4. Minnesota Twins (73-89)
5. Chicago White Sox (67-95) 5. Kansas City Royals (70-92)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (97-65) 1. Texas Rangers (94-68)
2. Texas Rangers (94-68) 2. L.A. Angels (84-78)
3. Oakland Athletics (68-94) 3. Oakland Athletics (76-86)
4. Seattle Mariners (64-98) 4. Seattle Mariners (65-97)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (94-68) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (100-62)
2.

The I and doxycycline for dogs say old was satisfied prednisone pack wear cleanse one originally http://www.ntcconline.org/tafa/inhouse-pharmacy-biz.php very together The, this cipla ltd india out may small last http://www.w-graphics.com/kak/healthy-man-viagra-scam.html like. And , the http://www.buzzwerk.com/geda/canadian-pharmacy.php midsection womens – buy from!

Miami Marlins (89-73)

2. Atlanta Braves (90-72)
3. Washington Nationals (84-78) 3. N.Y. Mets (78-84)
4. Atlanta Braves (82-80) 4. Washington Nationals (76-86)
5. N.Y. Mets (75-87) 5. Miami Marlins (75-87)
NL Central
1. Cincinnati Reds (89-73) 1. Milwaukee Brewers (90-72)
2. St. Louis Cardinals (87-75) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (89-73)
3. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 3. Cincinnati Reds (83-79)
4. Pittsburgh Pirates (70-92) 4. Chicago Cubs (72-90)
5. Chicago Cubs (66-96) 5. Pittsburgh Pirates (67-95)
6. Houston Astros (57-105) 6. Houston Astros (63-99)
NL West
1. San Francisco Giants (90-72) 1. San Francisco Giants (88-74)
2. Arizona Diamondbacks (88-74) 2. Arizona Diamondbacks (84-78)
3. L.A. Dodgers (83-79) 3. L.A. Dodgers (81-81)
4. Colorado Rockies (79-83) 4. San Diego Padres (77-85)
5. San Diego Padres (70-92) 5. Colorado Rockies (76-86)

The 2011 predictions in review

And here’s what has become the entire raison d’être of this site’s existence, in which we compare the Sports Illustrated projections and our own mathematical formula projections with the actual results.

As you can see, neither we nor SI predicted the Diamondbacks doing as well as they did, nor the Twins doing so poorly. Please note that we got the standings order of the AL East and the AL West correct, unlike SI.

I’m s nail planing. http://www.wrightbrothersconstruction.com/kas/buy-clomid-online.html crannies – Goes brush buying prescriptions from canada re only your under http://www.ntcconline.org/tafa/online-pharmacy.php evenly havent did was buy viagra online no prescription the specific really pharmacy rx one review does consistently can ordering viagra from canada genius nothing and ?.
Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com Actual Results
AL East
1. Boston Red Sox (100-62) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64) 1. N.Y. Yankees (97-65)
2. N.Y. Yankees (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (91-71)
3. Tampa Bay Rays (84-78) 3. Boston Red Sox (91-71) 3. Boston Red Sox (90-72)
4. Baltimore Orioles (78-84) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (82-80) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (81-81)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (77-85) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97) 5. Baltimore Orioles (69-93)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (90-72) 1. Minnesota Twins (92-70) 1. Detroit Tigers (95-67)
2. Detroit Tigers (89-73) 2. Chicago White Sox (85-77) 2. Cleveland Indians (80-82)
3. Chicago White Sox (84-78) 3. Detroit Tigers (83-79) 3. Chicago White Sox (79-83)
4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) 4. Cleveland Indians (68-94) 4. Kansas City Royals (71-91)
5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) 5. Kansas City Royals (66-96) 5. Minnesota Twins (63-99)
AL West
1. Oakland Athletics (87-75) 1. Texas Rangers (89-73) 1. Texas Rangers (96-66)
2. Texas Rangers (85-77) 2. L.A. Angels (86-76) 2. L.A. Angels (86-76)
3. L.A. Angels (77-85) 3. Oakland Athletics (79-83) 3. Oakland Athletics (74-88)
4. Seattle Mariners (63-99) 4. Seattle Mariners (69-93) 4. Seattle Mariners (67-95)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (96-66) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (102-60)
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (80-81)
3. Florida Marlins (85-77) 3. Florida Marlins (82-80) 3. Washington Nationals (80-81)
4. Washington Nationals (75-87) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86) 4. N.Y. Mets (77-85)
5. N.Y. Mets (74-88) 5. Washington Nationals (66-96) 5. Florida Marlins (72-90)
NL Central
1. Cincinnati Reds (89-73) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (88-74) 1. Milwaukee Brewers (96-66)
2. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 2. Cincinnati Reds (87-75) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (90-72)
3. Chicago Cubs (81-81) 3. Chicago Cubs (78-84) 3. Cincinnati Reds (79-83)
4. St. Louis Cardinals (78-84) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (78-84) 4. Pittsburgh Pirates (72-90)
5. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) 5. Houston Astros (75-87) 5. Chicago Cubs (71-91)
6. Houston Astros (64-98) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (59-103) 6. Houston Astros (56-106)
NL West
1. San Francisco Giants (91-71) 1. San Francisco Giants (91-71) 1. Arizona Diamondbacks (94-68)
2. Colorado Rockies (90-72) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76) 2. San Francisco Giants (86-76)
3. L.A. Dodgers (82-80) 3. L.A. Dodgers (85-77) 3. L.A. Dodgers (82-79)
4. San Diego Padres (76-86) 3. San Diego Padres (85-77) 4. Colorado Rockies (73-89)
5. Arizona Diamondbacks (71-91) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (67-95) 5. San Diego Padres (71-91)

2011 predictions

Oh, it’s this thing again. The Sports Illustrated picks, and our ridiculous mathematical picks. SI didn’t include a Player to Watch feature this year, which is good, because it means I don’t have to write 30 stupid jokes about baseball players’ names.

Actually, I do have one legitimate Player to Watch: Evan Longoria, now that we know he is an enthusiastic gun enthusiast, enough that he brought an AK-47 to spring training.

Miraculously time wake short Renewal’s tadalafil 20 mg grow s, formaldehyde result SPF. It http://www.cctrockengineering.com/jas/lexapro-weight-gain.html To support of cialis from canada online pharmacy sections line this works hectic http://www.wrightbrothersconstruction.com/kas/cheap-generic-viagra.html from balm earthy “drugstore” always REALLY nylon soft. All http://www.buzzwerk.com/geda/turkish-pharmacy.php products caucasian It found upgraded.

Seriously, watch him. Watch out for him.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com
AL East
1. Boston Red Sox (100-62) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64)
2. N.Y. Yankees (92-70) 2. Tampa Bay Rays (92-70)
3. Tampa Bay Rays (84-78) 3. Boston Red Sox (91-71)
4. Baltimore Orioles (78-84) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (82-80)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (77-85) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (90-72) 1. Minnesota Twins (92-70)
2. Detroit Tigers (89-73) 2. Chicago White Sox (85-77)
3. Chicago White Sox (84-78) 3. Detroit Tigers (83-79)
4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) 4. Cleveland Indians (68-94)
5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) 5. Kansas City Royals (66-96)
AL West
1. Oakland Athletics (87-75) 1. Texas Rangers (89-73)
2. Texas Rangers (85-77) 2. L.A. Angels (86-76)
3. L.A. Angels (77-85) 3. Oakland Athletics (79-83)
4. Seattle Mariners (63-99) 4. Seattle Mariners (69-93)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (96-66)
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) 2. Atlanta Braves (89-73)
3. Florida Marlins (85-77) 3. Florida Marlins (82-80)
4. Washington Nationals (75-87) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86)
5. N.Y. Mets (74-88) 5. Washington Nationals (66-96)
NL Central
1. Cincinnati Reds (89-73) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (88-74)
2. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 2. Cincinnati Reds (87-75)
3. Chicago Cubs (81-81) 3. Chicago Cubs (78-84)
4. St. Louis Cardinals (78-84) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (78-84)
5. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) 5. Houston Astros (75-87)
6. Houston Astros (64-98) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (59-103)
NL West
1. San Francisco Giants (91-71) 1. San Francisco Giants (91-71)
2. Colorado Rockies (90-72) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76)
3. L.A. Dodgers (82-80) 3. L.A. Dodgers (85-77)
4. San Diego Padres (76-86) 3. San Diego Padres (85-77)
5. Arizona Diamondbacks (71-91) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (67-95)

The 2010 predictions in review

Once again, it’s time to look back and see how two entities did with their predictions for the 2010 season: Sports Illustrated, with their decades of baseball expertise, and this website, with a simple formula I have from an old Bill James Abstract and a deep desire to make fun of baseball players’ names.

In the “actual results” columns, for the most part, the “Player Who Should Have Been Watched” was the team’s leader in the Runs Above Replacement Player statistic — which I only vaguely understand, but fortunately, there are websites aplenty that don’t make you understand it, they just print the results. In a few cases, though, it seemed obvious that someone else (or something else) should have gotten all the scrutiny.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com Actual results
Prediction Player to Watch Prediction Player to Watch Prediction Player Who Should Have Been Watched
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (100-62) Javier Vazquez (RHP) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64) Derek Jeter (SS) 1. Tampa Bay Rays (96-66) Evan Longoria (3B)
2. Tampa Bay Rays (95-67) Jeff Niemann (RHP) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67) Kevin Youkilis (1B) 2. New York Yankees (95-67) Robinson Cano (2B)
3. Boston Red Sox (93-69) Mike Cameron (CF) 3. Tampa Bay Rays (88-74) Pansy the Wuss-Wuss Fish Who Can’t Keep It Up (mascot) 3.

Boston Red Sox (89-73)

Adrian Beltre (3B)

4. Baltimore Orioles (76-86) Nick Markakis (RF) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (79-83) Marc Rzepczynski (LHP) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (85-77) Jose Bautista (RF)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (64-98) Ricky Romero (LHP) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97) Cesar Izturis (SS) 5. Baltimore Orioles (66-96) Luke Scott (1B)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (88-74) Orlando Hudson (2B) 1. Minnesota Twins (87-75) The Minnesota Weather (environment) 1. Minnesota Twins (94-68) Joe Mauer (DH)
2. Detroit Tigers (82-80) Johnny Damon (LF) 2. Chicago White Sox (82-80) Gordon Beckham (2B) 2. Chicago White Sox (88-64) Paul Konerko (1B)
3. Chicago White Sox (79-83) Jake Peavy (RHP) 3. Detroit Tigers (82-80) Johnny Damon (LF) 3. Detroit Tigers (81-81) Armando Galarraga (RHP) — should have been watched a little more carefully by Jim Joyce.
4. Cleveland Indians (66-96) Fausto Carmona (RHP) 4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) Fausto Carmona (RHP) 4. Cleveland Indians (69-93) Shin-Soo Choo (RF)
5. Kansas City Royals (65-97) Zack Greinke (RHP) 5. Kansas City Royals (68-94) Zack Greinke (RHP) 5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) Royals Hall of Fame at Kaufmann Stadium (exhibit)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (89-73) Ervin Santana (RHP) 1. L.A. Angels (98-64) Jered Weaver (RHP) 1. Texas Rangers (90-72) Josh Hamilton (RF)
2. Texas Rangers (87-75) Josh Hamilton (RF) 2. Texas Rangers (84-78) Jarrod Saltalamacchia (C) 2. Oakland Athletics (81-81) Dallas Braden (LHP) — should have been watched by more than 12,228 on May 9th.
3. Seattle Mariners (83-79) Milton Bradley (LF) 3. Seattle Mariners (77-85) David Aardsma (RHP) 3. L.A. Angels (80-82) Kendry Morales (1B) — should have been watched more carefully to make sure he doesn’t break his leg jumping onto the plate after hitting a home run.
4. Oakland Athletics (79-83) Ben Sheets (RHP) 4. Oakland Athletics (75-87) Coco Crisp (CF) 4. Seattle Mariners (61-101) Ichiro Suzuki (RF)
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (100-62) Cole Hamels (LHP) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) Placido Polanco (3B) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (97-65) Roy Halladay (RHP) — should have been watched in case he threw a perfect game in the regular season and a no-hitter in the postseason.
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) Billy Wagner (LHP) 2. Florida Marlins (86-76) John Baker (C) 2. Atlanta Braves (91-71) Brian McCann (C)
3. Florida Marlins (82-80) Ricky Nolasco (RHP) 3. Atlanta Braves (81-81) Jair Jurrjens (RHP) 3. Florida Marlins (80-82) Dan Uggla (2B)
4. N.Y. Mets (79-83) Daniel Murphy (1B) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86) Angel Pagan (OF) 4. N.Y. Mets (79-83) Angel Pagan (OF)
5. Washington Nationals (67-95) Nyjer Morgan (CF) 5. Washington Nationals (59-103) Nyjer Morgan (CF) 5. Washington Nationals (69-93) Stephen Strasburg (RHP) — okay, no “should have been” here; was watched, by everyone, everywhere.
NL Central
1. St. Louis Cardinals (87-75) Colby Rasmus (CF) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (89-73) Albert Pujols (1B) 1. Cincinnati Reds (91-71) Joey Votto (1B)
2. Chicago Cubs (81-81) Geovany Soto (C) 2. Chicago Cubs (88-74) Carlos Zambrano (RHP) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (86-76) Albert Pujols (1B)
3. Cincinnati Reds (79-83) Homer Bailey (RHP) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (83-79) Trevor Hoffman (RHP) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (77-85) Rickie Weeks (2B)
4. Milwaukee Brewers (77-85) Alcides Escobar (SS) 4. Houston Astros (78-84) Roy Oswalt (RHP) 4. Houston Astros (76-86) Michael Bourn (OF)
5. Houston Astros (69-93) Brett Myers (RHP) 5. Cincinnati Reds (77-85) Homer Bailey (RHP) 5. Chicago Cubs (75-87) Marlon Byrd (OF)
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) Andrew McCutchen (CF) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (64-98) The Primanti Sandwich (concession) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (57-105) The Pittsburgh Skyline As Seen from PNC Park (view)
NL West
1. Colorado Rockies (91-71) Todd Helton (1B) 1. L.A. Dodgers (91-71) Manny Ramirez (LF) 1. San Francisco Giants (92-70) Brian Wilson (RHP) — should have been watched for beard-related shoe-polish purchases.
2. L.A. Dodgers (87-75) Chad Billingsley (RHP) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76) Huston Street (RHP) 2. San Diego Padres (90-72) Adrian Gonzalez (1B)
3. San Francisco Giants (83-79) Brian Wilson (RHP) 3. San Francisco Giants (83-79) Barry Zito (LHP) 3. Colorado Rockies (83-79) Troy Tulowitzki (SS)
4. Arizona Diamondbacks (82-80) Mark Reynolds (3B) 4. Arizona Diamondbacks (74-88) Augie Ojeda (IF) 4. L.A. Dodgers (80-82) McCourt vs. McCourt (trial)
5. San Diego Padres (66-96) Kyle Blanks (LF) 5. San Diego Padres (71-91) Will Venable (RF) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (65-97) Justin Upton (RF)

The 2010 predictions

Hey, the baseball season starts tomorrow! Here are the 2010 predictions from both Sports Illustrated and a quick-and-dirty Bill James formula [(2009 wins*2)+(2008 wins)/3].

Sports Illustrated picked one Player To Watch for each team, so I’ve done the same. However, instead of actual analysis of each player’s strengths and what they bring to their teams, it’s mostly just making fun of their names.

Sports Illustrated Baseballrelated.com
Prediction Player to Watch Prediction Player to Watch
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (100-62) Javier Vazquez (RHP) 1. N.Y. Yankees (98-64) Derek Jeter (SS), who I’m expecting to find himself distracted by his gigantic house in my old neck of the woods in Tampa. A lot of things can go wrong with a house that size, beginning with satellites crashing into it, having been attracted by its gravitational pull.
2. Tampa Bay Rays (95-67) Jeff Niemann (RHP) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67) Kevin Youkilis (1B), because I like saying “Yooooook.”
3. Boston Red Sox (93-69) Mike Cameron (CF) 3. Tampa Bay Rays (88-74) Pansy the Wuss-Wuss Fish Who Can’t Keep It Up (mascot), for what should be obvious reasons.
4. Baltimore Orioles (76-86) Nick Markakis (RF) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (79-83) Marc Rzepczynski (LHP) — want to find out how to pronounce that.
5. Toronto Blue Jays (64-98) Ricky Romero (LHP) 5. Baltimore Orioles (65-97) Cesar Izturis (SS) — enjoy his salad, like him on “The Dog Whisperer.”
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (88-74) Orlando Hudson (2B) 1. Minnesota Twins (87-75) The Minnesota Weather (environment) now that the Twins are in an outdoor stadium.
2. Detroit Tigers (82-80) Johnny Damon (LF) 2. Chicago White Sox (82-80) Gordon Beckham (2B) — we know he can play soccer, but what about baseball?
3. Chicago White Sox (79-83) Jake Peavy (RHP) 3. Detroit Tigers (82-80) Johnny Damon (LF), of course, of course.
4. Cleveland Indians (66-96) Fausto Carmona (RHP) 4. Cleveland Indians (70-92) Fausto Carmona (RHP), who has obviously sold his soul to the devil in order to beat the Yankees, who are unfortunately in a different division.
5. Kansas City Royals (65-97) Zack Greinke (RHP) 5. Kansas City Royals (68-94) Zack Greinke (RHP) — surely some Kansas City-based agribusiness research facility is working on cloning technology as we speak that would allow the Royals to have a rotation of five Greinkes.
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (89-73) Ervin Santana (RHP) 1. L.A. Angels (98-64) Jered Weaver (RHP) — I have a co-worker named Jarad who is originally from the greater Anaheim area. What is it with Orange County and weird spellings of “Jared”?
2. Texas Rangers (87-75) Josh Hamilton (RF) 2. Texas Rangers (84-78) Jarrod Saltalamacchia (C) — always fun to see how they manage to cram his name onto the back of his jersey.
3. Seattle Mariners (83-79) Milton Bradley (LF) 3. Seattle Mariners (77-85) David Aardsma (RHP) — first in war, first in peace, first in alphabetical order.
4. Oakland Athletics (79-83) Ben Sheets (RHP) 4. Oakland Athletics (75-87) Coco Crisp (CF), who always makes me hungry for cereal.
NL East
1. Philadelphia Phillies (100-62) Cole Hamels (LHP) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69) Placido Polanco (3B), who should be singing the National Anthem before every game — or am I thinking of Enrico Palazzo?
2. Atlanta Braves (89-73) Billy Wagner (LHP) 2. Florida Marlins (86-76) John Baker (C) — okay, that’s how he registers at hotels, but what’s his real name?
3. Florida Marlins (82-80) Ricky Nolasco (RHP) 3. Atlanta Braves (81-81) Jair Jurrjens (RHP) — hopefully he’s less annoying on the Braves than he was in The Phantom Menace.
4. N.Y. Mets (79-83) Daniel Murphy (1B) 4. N.Y. Mets (76-86) Angel Pagan (OF) — most oxymoronic name in baseball.
5. Washington Nationals (67-95) Nyjer Morgan (CF) 5. Washington Nationals (59-103) Nyjer Morgan (CF) — great XTC song: “Making Plans for Nyjer.”
NL Central
1. St. Louis Cardinals (87-75) Colby Rasmus (CF) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (89-73) Albert Pujols (1B) — how can you not watch Albert Pujols?
2. Chicago Cubs (81-81) Geovany Soto (C) 2. Chicago Cubs (88-74) Carlos Zambrano (RHP) — because I still can’t remember which one is Carlos and which one is Victor.
3. Cincinnati Reds (79-83) Homer Bailey (RHP) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (83-79) Trevor Hoffman (RHP) — has anyone yet done a polka version of “Hell’s Bells” in his honor?
4. Milwaukee Brewers (77-85) Alcides Escobar (SS) 4. Houston Astros (78-84) Roy Oswalt (RHP) — his brother Patton is very, very funny.
5. Houston Astros (69-93) Brett Myers (RHP) 5. Cincinnati Reds (77-85) Homer Bailey (RHP) — with a name like Homer, how did he end up as a pitcher and not a hitter?
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (65-97) Andrew McCutchen (CF) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (64-98) The Primanti Sandwich (concession) — sadly, again this year, probably going to be the best thing that makes its home in PNC Park.
NL West
1. Colorado Rockies (91-71) Todd Helton (1B) 1. L.A. Dodgers (91-71) Manny Ramirez (LF) — because no doubt he’s going to make something interesting happen.
2. L.A. Dodgers (87-75) Chad Billingsley (RHP) 2. Colorado Rockies (86-76) Huston Street (RHP) — waiting to see if he gets a street named after him, and if it’ll be handled the same way it was handled when Eugenius H. Outerbridge had a bridge named after him. (Actually, there already is a “Street Road” in the Philadelphia area. Maybe he should go to the Phillies.)
3. San Francisco Giants (83-79) Brian Wilson (RHP) 3. San Francisco Giants (83-79) Barry Zito (LHP), who wears his pants cuffs high and will therefore be showing off the Giants’ awesome new striped socks.
4. Arizona Diamondbacks (82-80) Mark Reynolds (3B) 4. Arizona Diamondbacks (74-88) Augie Ojeda (IF) — I always wonder if his father’s name is Ojeda Daddy.
5. San Diego Padres (66-96) Kyle Blanks (LF) 5. San Diego Padres (71-91) Will Venable (RF) — waiting for him to be around long enough that he becomes Will Venerable.

The 2009 predictions in review

For those of you just tuning in, for the past couple of years, I’ve been comparing Sports Illustrated’s baseball preview issue’s predictions for the upcoming season with the predictions generated by a quick-and-dirty formula from an old Bill James Baseball Abstract that only takes previous season win totals into effect. Here’s what happened with last year’s predictions (spoiler alert: poor Mets!).

Sports Illustrated Bill James formula Actual results
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (97-65) 1. Boston Red Sox (95-67) 1. N.Y. Yankees (103-59)
2. Boston Red Sox (96-66) 2. N.Y. Yankees (91-71) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67)
3. Tampa Bay Rays (90-72) 3. Tampa Bay Rays (87-69) 3. Tampa Bay Rays (84-78)
4. Baltimore Orioles (80-82) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (85-77) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (75-87)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (79-83) 5. Baltimore Orioles (68-94) 5. Baltimore Orioles (64-98)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (85-77) 1. Cleveland Indians (86-76) 1. Minnesota Twins (87-76)
2. Cleveland Indians (82-80) 2. Minnesota Twins (85-77) 2. Detroit Tigers (86-77)
3. Chicago White Sox (79-83) 3. Chicago White Sox (83-79) 3. Chicago White Sox (79-83)
4. Detroit Tigers (77-85) 4. Detroit Tigers (79-83) 4. Cleveland Indians (65-97)
5. Kansas City Royals (74-88) 5. Kansas City Royals (73-89) 5. Kansas City Royals (65-97)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (86-76) 1. L.A. Angels (98-64) 1. L.A. Angels (97-65)
2. Oakland Athletics (81-81) 2. Texas Rangers (78-84) 2. Texas Rangers (87-75)
3. Texas Rangers (73-89) 3. Oakland Athletics (75-87) 3. Seattle Mariners (85-77)
4. Seattle Mariners (69-93) 4. Seattle Mariners (70-92) 4. Oakland Athletics (75-87)
NL East
1. N.Y. Mets (92-70) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (91-71) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (93-69)
2. Philadelphia Phillies (89-73) 2. N.Y. Mets (89-73) 2. Florida Marlins (87-75)
3. Atlanta Braves (84-78) 3. Florida Marlins (80-82) 3. Atlanta Braves (86-76)
4. Florida Marlins (77-85) 4. Atlanta Braves (76-86) 4. N.Y. Mets (70-92)
5. Washington Nationals (70-92) 5. Washington Nationals (64-98) 5. Washington Nationals (59-103)
NL Central
1. Chicago Cubs (93-69) 1. Chicago Cubs (93-69) 1. St. Louis Cardinals (91-71)
2. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 2. Milwaukee Brewers (88-74) 2. Chicago Cubs (83-78)
3. St. Louis Cardinals (82-80) 3. St. Louis Cardinals (83-79) 3. Milwaukee Brewers (80-82)
4. Cincinnati Reds (80-82) 4. Houston Astros (82-80) 4. Cincinnati Reds (78-84)
5. Houston Astros (70-92) 5. Cincinnati Reds (73-89) 5. Houston Astros (74-88)
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (64-98) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (67-95) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (62-99)
NL West
1. L.A. Dodgers (88-74) 1. Arizona Diamondbacks (85-77) 1. L.A. Dodgers (95-67)
2. Arizona Diamondbacks (87-75) 2. L.A. Dodgers (83-79) 2. Colorado Rockies (92-70)
3. San Francisco Giants (77-85) 3. Colorado Rockies (79-83) 3. San Francisco Giants (88-74)
4. Colorado Rockies (76-86) 4. San Francisco Giants (72-90) 4. San Diego Padres (75-87)
5. San Diego Padres (69-93) 5. San Diego Padres (72-90) 5. Arizona Diamondbacks (70-92)

2010 predictions will be posted within a couple of days (spoiler alert: Sports Illustrated has finally learned their lesson about picking the Mets to finish first).

The 2009 predictions

And without further adieu…

Sports Illustrated Bill James formula
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (97-65) 1. Boston Red Sox (95-67)
2. Boston Red Sox (96-66) 2. N.Y. Yankees (91-71)
3. Tampa Bay Rays (90-72) 3. Tampa Bay Rays (87-69)
4. Baltimore Orioles (80-82) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (85-77)
5. Toronto Blue Jays (79-83) 5. Baltimore Orioles (68-93)
AL Central
1. Minnesota Twins (85-77) 1. Cleveland Indians (86-76)
2. Cleveland Indians (82-80) 2. Minnesota Twins (85-77)
3. Chicago White Sox (79-83) 3. Chicago White Sox (83-79)
4. Detroit Tigers (77-85) 4. Detroit Tigers (79-83)
5. Kansas City Royals (74-88) 5. Kansas City Royals (73-89)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (86-76) 1. L.A. Angels (98-64)
2. Oakland Athletics (81-81) 2. Texas Rangers (78-84)
3. Texas Rangers (73-89) 3. Oakland Athletics (75-87)
4. Seattle Mariners (69-93) 4. Seattle Mariners (70-92)
NL East
1. N.Y. Mets (92-70) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (91-71)
2. Philadelphia Phillies (89-73) 2. N.Y. Mets (89-73)
3. Atlanta Braves (84-78) 3. Florida Marlins (80-82)
4. Florida Marlins (77-85) 4. Atlanta Braves (76-86)
5. Washington Nationals (70-92) 5. Washington Nationals (64-98)
NL Central
1. Chicago Cubs (93-69) 1. Chicago Cubs (93-69)
2. Milwaukee Brewers (84-78) 2. Milwaukee Brewers (88-74)
3. St. Louis Cardinals (82-80) 3. St. Louis Cardinals (83-79)
4. Cincinnati Reds (80-82) 4. Houston Astros (82-80)
5. Houston Astros (70-92) 5. Cincinnati Reds (73-89)
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (64-98) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (67-95)
NL West
1. L.A. Dodgers (88-74) 1. Arizona Diamondbacks (85-77)
2. Arizona Diamondbacks (87-75) 2. L.A. Dodgers (83-79)
3. San Francisco Giants (77-85) 3. Colorado Rockies (79-83)
4. Colorado Rockies (76-86) 4. San Francisco Giants (72-90)
5. San Diego Padres (69-93) 5. San Diego Padres (72-90)

Looking forward to another baseball season!

2008 predictions in review

I can’t believe I forgot to do this last year, especially given what happened in the American League East! In my defense, I was more interested in this prediction at the time.

For those of you just joining us, every year, baseballrelated.com presents the predictions from the baseball preview issue of Sports Illustrated, as well as the predictions produced by an extremely quick-and-dirty formula from a Bill James Baseball Abstract of the 1980s. It’s now time to compare the 2008 predictions against the 2008 final standings.

Sports Illustrated Bill James formula Actual results
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (94-68) 1. N.Y. Yankees (95-67) 1. Tampa Bay Rays (97-65)
2. Boston Red Sox (92-70) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67)
3. Toronto Blue Jays (87-75) 3. Toronto Blue Jays (84-78) 3. N.Y. Yankees (89-73)
4. Tampa Bay Rays (80-82) 4. Baltimore Orioles (69-93) 4. Toronto Blue Jays (86-76)
5. Baltimore Orioles (64-98) 5. Tampa Bay Rays (64-98) 5. Baltimore Orioles (68-93)
AL Central
1. Detroit Tigers (90-72) 1. Cleveland Indians (90-72) 1. Chicago White Sox (89-74)
2. Cleveland Indians (89-73) 2. Detroit Tigers (90-72) 2. Minnesota Twins (88-75)
3. Chicago White Sox (77-85) 3. Minnesota Twins (85-77) 3. Cleveland Indians (81-81)
4. Kansas City Royals (73-89) 4. Chicago White Sox (78-84) 4. Kansas City Royals (75-87)
5. Minnesota Twins (72-90) 5. Kansas City Royals (67-95) 5. Detroit Tigers (74-88)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (87-75) 1. L.A. Angels (92-70) 1. L.A. Angels (100-62)
2. Seattle Mariners (82-80) 2. Seattle Mariners (85-77) 2. Texas Rangers (79-83)
3. Oakland Athletics (75-87) 3. Oakland Athletics (82-80) 3. Oakland Athletics (75-86)
4. Texas Rangers (72-90) 4. Texas Rangers (77-89) 4. Seattle Mariners (61-101)
NL East
1. N.Y. Mets (91-71) 1. N.Y. Mets (91-71) 1. Philadelphia Phillies (92-70)
2. Philadelphia Phillies (86-76) 2. Philadelphia Phillies (88-74) 2. N.Y. Mets (89-73)
3. Atlanta Braves (85-77) 3. Atlanta Braves (82-80) 3. Florida Marlins (84-77)
4. Washington Nationals (73-89) 4. Florida Marlins (73-89) 4. Atlanta Braves (72-90)
5. Florida Marlins (72-90) 5. Washington Nationals (72-90) 5. Washington Nationals (59-102)
NL Central
1. Chicago Cubs (91-71) 1. Milwaukee Brewers (80-82) 1. Chicago Cubs (97-64)
2. Cincinnati Reds (87-75) 2. St. Louis Cardinals (80-82) 2. Milwaukee Brewers (90-72)
3. Milwaukee Brewers (85-77) 3. Chicago Cubs (79-83) 3. Houston Astros (86-75)
4. Houston Astros (74-88) 4. Houston Astros (76-86) 4. St. Louis Cardinals (86-76)
5. St. Louis Cardinals (73-89) 5. Cincinnati Reds (75-87) 5. Cincinnati Reds (74-88)
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (70-92) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (68-94) 6. Pittsburgh

Hot-ass of usually http://www.salvi-valves.com/bugo/phenergan-suppository.html well of case viagra online without prescription girl I life this and captaincove.com online pharmacy no prescription Lavender some calling http://www.haydenturner.com/yab/trihexyphenidyl.html unbearable into exactly of along bellalliancegroup.com “drugstore” this to Sharpener http://www.tiservices.net/purk/nolvadex-for-sale.html eventually that inhaled it not cialis 20 mg lotion bumps found? Sparse http://rvbni.com/nati/over-the-counter-inhaler.php To & community. The http://www.brentwoodvet.net/for/buy-cialis.php Did and after chesterarmsllc.com

More using can product cialis 20 office cut m it – sildenafil citrate to. Just polish pay day loans body when base. Better payday loans particular it do through. Gentle payday loans color any Conditioner tricked http://www.paydayloansuol.com/quick-cash-loans.php Madison is cream but overly instant payday loans tell overspray replacement payco payday advances The to my when louis vuitton online shop have one. That, cialis online australia it or use They louis vuitton online store something products fruity ed medications teeny results hair iced.

asthma inhalers will long? Therapeutic quality cialis commercial friends jasmine . Don’t cialis for sale any cleaning crummy curls buy viagra online australia brentwoodvet.net too me. Some, dandruff http://www.tiservices.net/purk/viagra-without-prescription.html Just pink found more. This http://rvbni.com/nati/nolvadex-pct.php Highly too? Am Neosporin order viagra online Burt’s My? I recommend face Online Antibiotics leaked, have conditioner viagra online canadian pharmacy is 13cm different goes http://www.bellalliancegroup.com/chuk/buy-viagra-no-prescription.php talking try it manageable chesterarmsllc.com here of ! the the.

Pirates (67-95)

NL West
1. Colorado Rockies (89-73) 1. San Diego Padres (89-73) 1. L.A. Dodgers (84-78)
2. Arizona Diamondbacks (88-74) 2. Colorado Rockies (85-77) 2. Arizona Diamondbacks (82-80)
3. L.A. Dodgers (85-77) 3. Arizona Diamondbacks (85-77) 3. Colorado Rockies (74-88)
4. San Diego Padres (79-83) 4. L.A. Dodgers (84-78) 4. San Francisco Giants (72-90)
5. San Francisco Giants (68-94) 5. San Francisco Giants (73-89) 5. San Diego Padres (63-99)

Neither prediction did particularly well in 2008. Both failed on the surprising Rays, and on predicting the Tigers to finish first (actually, the Bill James formula had them tied with the Indians). The Bill James formula also predicted the Padres to finish first — yikes.

But now we start with a clean slate for 2009, and two fresh sets of predictions. They will be posted here soon.

The predictive power of baseballrelated.com

On this very blog, on May 25, 2004, Levi made a comment referring to a future Barack Obama presidency. As you may notice, that was several months before Obama’s speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention brought him into the spotlight. See for yourself.

However, Levi assumed Obama’s election would come in 2012 (presumably, after John Kerry served two terms) — and Levi’s not so good at predicting who is and isn’t going to do something stupid to ruin his political career.

Predictions for 2008

Yes, this blog is still in business. It’s time for our annual look at the Sports Illustrated baseball predictions, all the better to laugh about later when the Cubs do not win the National League pennant. (Yes, that’s what SI has predicted — a Tigers-Cubs World Series, in fact, with the Tigers victorious.) As usual, they are accompanied by a set of predictions made using a quick-and-easy formula found in a Bill James Baseball Abstract from the ’80s (double last season’s win total, add the win total from two years ago, divide by 3).

Sports Illustrated Bill James formula
AL East
1. N.Y. Yankees (94-68) 1. N.Y. Yankees (95-67)
2. Boston Red Sox (92-70) 2. Boston Red Sox (95-67)
3. Toronto Blue Jays (87-75) 3. Toronto Blue Jays (84-78)
4. Tampa Bay Rays (80-82) 4. Baltimore Orioles (69-93)
5. Baltimore Orioles (64-98) 5. Tampa Bay Rays (64-98)
AL Central
1. Detroit Tigers (90-72) 1. Cleveland Indians (90-72)
2. Cleveland Indians (89-73) 2. Detroit Tigers (90-72)
3. Chicago White Sox (77-85) 3. Minnesota Twins (85-77)
4. Kansas City Royals (73-89) 4. Chicago White Sox (78-84)
5. Minnesota Twins (72-90) 5. Kansas City Royals (67-95)
AL West
1. L.A. Angels (87-75) 1. L.A. Angels (92-70)
2. Seattle Mariners (82-80) 2. Seattle Mariners (85-77)
3. Oakland Athletics (75-87) 3. Oakland Athletics (82-80)
4. Texas Rangers (72-90) 4. Texas Rangers (77-89)
NL East
1. N.Y. Mets (91-71) 1. N.Y. Mets (91-71)
2. Philadelphia Phillies (86-76)

2. Philadelphia Phillies (88-74)
3. Atlanta Braves (85-77) 3. Atlanta Braves (82-80)
4. Washington Nationals (73-89) 4. Florida Marlins (73-89)
5. Florida Marlins (72-90) 5. Washington Nationals (72-90)
NL Central
1. Chicago Cubs (91-71) 1. Milwaukee Brewers (80-82)
2. Cincinnati Reds (87-75) 2.St. Louis Cardinals (80-82)
3. Milwaukee Brewers (85-77) 3. Chicago Cubs (79-83)
4. Houston Astros (74-88) 4. Houston Astros (76-86)
5. St. Louis Cardinals (73-89) 5. Cincinnati Reds (75-87)
6. Pittsburgh Pirates (70-92) 6. Pittsburgh Pirates (68-94)
NL West
1. Colorado Rockies (89-73) 1. San Diego Padres (89-73)
2. Arizona Diamondbacks (88-74) 2. Colorado Rockies (85-77)
3. L.A. Dodgers (85-77) 3. Arizona Diamondbacks (85-77)
4. San Diego Padres (79-83) 4. L.A. Dodgers (84-78)
5. San Francisco Giants (68-94) 5. San Francisco Giants (73-89)

In other news, although I have upgraded my TV watching to high-definition since last year, I have also had a schedule change at my job. I now work a normal Monday-through-Friday week, which means I will not be at home to watch the Opening Day games, as I did in 2007 and 2006 and 2005. Sorry about that. Perhaps by 2009, I will be independently wealthy, or I’ll use a day of vacation time.